Answer: B
Explanation: how is it showing it is tolerant or caring so it has to be B
Answer:
a. based on his view as an expert in the tech world.
Explanation:
Jerry Kaplan is a known computer scientist who wrote the book entitled, <em>"Humans Need Not Apply: A Guide to Wealth and Work in the Age of Artificial Intelligence" </em>in <em>2015. </em>This book is about his own analysis of the pros and cons of artificial intelligence. He's considered an expert in the tech world because he even pioneered the use of computers with stylus and the mobile device called "tablet." The book is not just about the technological advances that people may find in the future, but it is also about the danger of using these and how the society can prevent such occurrence.
Answer:
A moral dilemma is shown here
Explanation:
Starting with the last word, <em>perfidy </em>is a deliberate breach of faith or trust; in the context of war - we can assume that this the case because of the word <em>peace</em><em> loving country</em> - perfidy can actually lead to warcrimes, like waving a white flag and then kill the enemy.
So the moral dilemma is that a country is very likely to be uncomfortable with a pact, the other side probably being a bit of a war loving country, but diplomatic relations deny the possibility of breaking the pact.
The part <em>not wishing to take the initiative of breaking the pact </em>is, if I´m not mistaken, a subordinate adjective clause that refers to the noun <em>country</em>.
So this country, not wishing etc., could not resort to perfidy either. Because that would be even worse, considering the fact that it is a peace loving country.
The answer is D rhetorical question
