1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
professor190 [17]
3 years ago
6

Why do you think companies engage in corporate crime? Do you think that society should be doing more about corporate crime? Why

or why not? What measures could be taken to reduce corporate crime?
Law
1 answer:
I am Lyosha [343]3 years ago
7 0
I do think that society should be doing more about corporate crime because these companies are taking large sums of money from people and other businesses, and potentially the government. ... Also, police could use the time saved to focus on more violent and pressing crimes.
You might be interested in
The PCR technique can make many, many copies of DNA. True or false
snow_lady [41]

Answer:

the answer is true mark brainlest

6 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between the supreme courts and the district courts
sergeinik [125]

Answer:Court Structure

Explanation:The Constitution and laws of each state establish the state courts. A court of last resort, often known as a Supreme Court, is usually the highest court. ... Below these appeals courts are the state trial courts. Some are referred to as Circuit or District Courts.

8 0
3 years ago
Type the correct answer in the box. Spell all words correctly.
Firdavs [7]

Answer:

security guards

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Cases heard by the Supreme Court are named for the two or more parties who oppose each other. A party can be either an individua
Oxana [17]

Answer:

Cherokee Nation v. Georgia.

Explanation:

The 1831 Supreme Court case of the Cherokee Nation v. Georgia was a court ruling between the Cherokee Nation, the petitioners, against the state of Georgia, the respondent.

In this court case, the Cherokees filed a complaint against the State of Georgia, asking if the state has any jurisdiction to impose laws on the Nation. This was because the state has promised Cherokee lands to Georgian settlers if they settle in the state. The court decided that since the Cherokees are a dependent nation, it cannot make any decision as it has no jurisdiction over the case. Thus, this means that the Cherokee Nation cannot have any legal recourse to stop the state from taking their lands. This case was then followed up by the 1832 Worcester v. Georgia ruling where the court ruled in favor of the Cherokee people.

Thus, the correct answer is Cherokee Nation v. Georgia.

3 0
3 years ago
in 1945 the United States helped form what organization dedicated to preserving world Peace? A. the United Nations B. world heal
trasher [3.6K]
A. The United Nations
6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • There are 3 main methods of gathering crime statistics. Which of the following is true of self-report surveys?
    14·1 answer
  • For younger drivers, which of the following is NOT considered a risk factor?
    7·1 answer
  • What does an individual's effective tax rate indicate?
    13·1 answer
  • According to the Court's ruling in Korematsu v. United States (1947), constitutional rights may be suspended during times of war
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following are consistent with Contractionary Fiscal Policy
    14·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes voting rights in the 1800s?
    15·1 answer
  • Write about a unique quality you have that makes you special?
    5·2 answers
  • ***ECONOMICS***
    11·1 answer
  • Name some poetic device used in my mother at sixty six by Kamala Das. 1970 ​
    6·1 answer
  • a man is accused of holding up a liquor store and stealing hundreds of dollars from the cash register. where is this case heard
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!