Answer:
The author challenges readers, which makes readers question their own views on protecting sequoias.
Explanation:
The impact of the author's choice to begin the article with those two sentences was to challenge the reader to question their views about protecting sequoias.
The first sentence began by saying that we are often told that the world is deteriorating because of love of money (sacrifice to mormon) and that every sequoia he knows is "waving its branches for joy" because it has heard the good news about the defending of trees.
Answer:
No, because evidence of the beliefs or opinions of a witness on matters of religion is not admissible to impair credibility.
Explanation:
In this context, credibility is only attained by an oath sworn with lawfully certified objects or items representing the religious beliefs of the state and not necessarily the genuine or validity of the witness declaration with such religious object to swore against the declaration of truth in the court of law.
Well first you have to know the that between hair and fur, they are merely the same thing. The hair length/type (and all that jazz) of the animal depends on the parents genetic DNA that is passed on to the offspring.
The answer is c im pretty sure all the rest are fragments
