I’m pretty sure the first one to, so sorry if wrong
<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>
"Internal Immigration" alludes to development starting with one area then onto the next. Albeit worldwide movement gets more consideration, the more noteworthy segment of versatility happened inside or between districts as individuals moved their work, material riches, and social thoughts.
On a very basic level, moves in relocation designs start in changes in landholding, business, statistic designs, and the area of capital. Long-standing examples of portability changed around 1750, when a stamped populace increment and expansion of country industry settled rustic individuals in assembling towns and towns, while those in different areas took to the street.
The industrialization of the nineteenth century delivered a urban culture and high movement rates that along these lines subsided in the twentieth century.
"<span>b. Some serfs had their own small farms, where they grew food to feed their families" is no true, since they always worked for the lords. </span>
The best explanation for the lack of a trade route between Phoenicia and Memphis, the capital of lower Egypt, is that "<span>overland travel between Phoenicia and Memphis was too difficult" since the terrain was highly uneven. </span>
Answer:
Factory smoke and other conditions
Explanation:
Back in the second industrial revolution there were many factories being built, and there were a lot of people willing to work for lower wages. Conditions were harsh, as there was a lot of smog, factory smoke, etc. and many people were harmed by the many machines in factories that had no safety precautions. Also, the gases and smoke caused breathing and lung illnesses.
