Answer:
Machiavelli claims that a leader must find a balance between a temperate and a cruel attitude to be successful. He makes a very effective argument. First, he uses deductive reasoning by stating a conclusion that he uses to prove his point. He says that if a leader is not cruel, his subjects will rebel and no one will obey the law. Second, his evidence is compelling. Machiavelli uses historical examples to support his ideas, which are clear and interesting to read. Finally, he uses sophisticated diction, creating a serious tone that provides a sense of authority. His reasoning, evidence, and diction all work together to support his claim, making his argument both horrifying and effective.
Explanation:
The Persian Gulf War cited by some as an event that fueled Islamic extremism because <span>Islamic extremists resented U.S. intervention and influence in the Middle East. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the last option or the fourth option. I hope the answer comes to your help.</span>
This literary device is an example of "foreshadowing" - an indication of how future events will be effected.
A. is a duty of congress. They can say a law is unconstitutional based in their views on the law but they cant declare one unconstitutional. But the President can declare a law unconstitutional and change it.
The answer is <span>cities my dude
--------------------------------------</span>
