1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MA_775_DIABLO [31]
3 years ago
8

Imagine you are Mr. Hansom. Discuss why you would (or would not) call Chondra for an interview.

English
2 answers:
VARVARA [1.3K]3 years ago
6 0
If I were<span> Mr. Hansom, I would call Chondra for an interview because she fits the required qualifications in the resume. There are things to consider for her to be accepted in the job offered by the company. Because she achieved most of these qualifications, then I will accept her.</span>
Musya8 [376]3 years ago
5 0

Chondra is a qualified professional in most requirements, she is interested in the job and she fits the job description very well according to the resume. An interview doesn't mean a person is hired, so if I had the opportunity to talk face to face with someone who seems to fit what I need, as Mr. Hansom, I'd obviously call Chondra for an interview.

You might be interested in
Talking about a subject with classmates can be considered activating prior knowledge.
Reptile [31]

Answer:

T its is prior knowledge

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1.
alina1380 [7]

Answer: Every day, we make hundreds of choices.

Explanation: We choose what to wear, what to do when we get home from work or school, and how to respond when someone makes fun of us. Sometimes we also make big decision, such as what kind of school to go to, what career to pursue, whether to get married, and whether to have a child. Sometimes people make decisions that are even bigger than these because the decisions affect hundreds or millions of people - decisions about war and peace or about changes in the laws. Even if we ourselves don't make such big decisions, we need to understand how they are made. Most of the time, we make these choices without thinking. For small, routine choices such as how to respond when your friend starts a conversation with you, you do not need to think. You have learned how to talk and how to behave in a friendly way without thinking at all, and your habits serve you well. You could behave differently than you do, of course, but your behavior is probably fine as it is. In other cases, though, you THINK about your decisions, from what to wear in the morning to how to spend your money. Sometimes people make choices without thinking when they really ought to think a bit. For example, we sometimes say things that hurt people's feelings and then we feel bad for having said them. Can you think of other examples of things we do because we didn't think first? WHEN it is worth thinking about decisions and, mostly, HOW to think about them once you start thinking. It will teach by example. You will be given a problem about decision making. First, think about the problem and try to answer it. You can discuss the problem with someone else. Then turn the page and look at the answer carefully. Where do these answers come from, and why are they right? The answers come from a field of study called decision theory. It is taught in colleges and graduate schools. It is sometimes used as a way of making very important decisions such as whether to have surgery or where to locate an airport. People who study decision theory and write about agree about some things and disagree about others.

7 0
2 years ago
Who is Victor telling his story to in Chapters 1-5?
Lelechka [254]

Answer:

the answer is Robert Walton

5 0
3 years ago
Which sentence would be the best addition to Yuma's
kykrilka [37]

Answer:

O Despite the controversy surrounding its origins, the  impact of film is not contested

Explanation:

In the given passage, Yuma wrote the impact of film in the modern world. The given conclusion also includes a statement about how it would become a normal presence in our lives.

But among the given options, the sentence <em>"despite the controversy surrounding its origins the impact of film is not contested"</em> would be the best addition to the given conclusion passage. This is because the two conclusion sentences were written by Yuma mention the time film emerged and be a part of daily American life. And adding detail about the controversy surrounding the origin of films and how their impact is not contested will add to a much more detailed conclusion.

Thus, the correct answer is the third option.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Need help asap!!! 30pts
yaroslaw [1]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In Gardner's Grendel, how does Grendel classify humans?
    11·2 answers
  • Marinorama
    8·1 answer
  • What forces were in conflict at the time of the start of the trials? How did all the trouble begin?
    12·1 answer
  • Which BEST analyzes a connection between Sullivan and a historical issue of the period in which she wrote? A) Sullivan wrote of
    6·1 answer
  • Helene's best friend sang _______ during the choir concert
    10·1 answer
  • How many dog breeds is there in the world?
    15·1 answer
  • It's a strange taste, but you<br> used to it.
    8·1 answer
  • Which statement is true about blockchain?
    15·1 answer
  • Please helppp
    6·1 answer
  • Choose the sentence below that is written correctly. Question 1 options: Because these starlings are frightened of falcons they
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!