1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MariettaO [177]
3 years ago
9

In Pavlov's demonstration of classical conditioning, the conditioned response was salivation. The unconditioned response was____

___.
Social Studies
1 answer:
beks73 [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The unconditioned response was also salivation, but elicited not by the sound of the bell, but by the food.

In classical conditioning, an unconditioned response (which is an immediate response by a neutral stimulus), can become a conditioned response when associated with a conditioned stimulus.

In other words, it is only natural for a dog to salivate at the sight or smell of food (thus unconditioned) but the same respone becomes <u>conditioned</u> when associated with a different stimulus, such as the sound of a bell.

You might be interested in
Which term describes a unique landform?<br> sound<br> glacier<br> isthmus<br> or fault
4vir4ik [10]
Isthmus.........................................
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Are the Vikings the chameleons?
diamong [38]

Answer:

no not at all

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Compare and contrast Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification with Mosca’s conflict perspective of s
Alex Ar [27]

Answer:

<h3>The comparison and contrast of Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification with Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification lies on the concept of social position and power.</h3>

Explanation:

Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective of social stratification and Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification all emphasize on the presence of a power structure in a society which directly corresponds to the  position of an individual.  They all believed that society operates according to the social needs and that every individual performs their tasks accordingly.

The line of distinction between Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective and Mosca’s conflict perspective lies in the nature of men. Mosca believes that man is evil and dominating by nature and that compels him/her to misuse his position. He brings out the authority and power of the ruling class as an example to this argument. He argues that people in good position will eventually become more powerful as men are ambitious and selfish. They will gradually exploit people from lower position and use their power for their own personal gains.

While on the other hand, Davis and Moore argue that the greater the role of an individual is, the greater should be the reward. They illustrate the idea that people with bigger and greater roles should be given more importance because of their greater contributions to the society. Their perspective of social stratification emphasize that not everyone can perform the exclusive task of the doctors, therefore those who could perform such complicated tasks should be paid and rewarded more. Davis and Moore do not consider misuse of position and power by people of great influence.

In my opinion, Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification is more applicable and realistic. The fact that those who worked hard deserves a reward is a universal doctrine. These people spent a lot of effort and time before acquiring the position they are in today. Their effort and hard work should be rewarded greatly as they will contribute significantly to the society. Though, this perspective does not bring into account the chances of misuse of power and position, such elements can be controlled through efficient law and state control.

6 0
3 years ago
in intragroup conflict, Select one: a. sources of conflict can include ideas, thoughts, emotions, values, predispositions, or dr
Alex_Xolod [135]

Answer:

C) conflict affects the ability of the group to resolve differences and continue to achieve its goals effectively.

Explanation:

An intragroup conflict is a conflict between the people in a group. Conflicts are considered to have negative aspects because they correspond to periods of tension and dissatisfaction of people and groups and have positive aspects because confrontation generates change, which is the foundation of evolution and social development. This type of conflict often affects the group's ability to resolve differences and continue to achieve their goals effectively, making the group appear weak and insignificant.

8 0
3 years ago
What shoes did michael jordan wear in his last game?
Rus_ich [418]
Air Jordan 14………………….
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • imagine georgia charges florida trucking companies a tax to use its highways to pass through other states. which of the followin
    15·1 answer
  • One way to use your visual learning ability effectively is to
    14·1 answer
  • The ________ states that the opportunity cost of producing a good always rises as one produces more of it.a. law of increasing r
    12·1 answer
  • Small particles that have mass and positive electrical charges are
    15·1 answer
  • One of the ways in which urban dwellers have tried to push back against crime in their urban neighborhoods is through the implem
    14·1 answer
  • Early humans migrated to the americans by crossing the?
    6·1 answer
  • Fter completing school to become a scribe, the student would need to be an apprentice. What is an apprentice?
    6·2 answers
  • Help me please i need the answers fast
    14·1 answer
  • Your friend Felipe doesn’t understand cultural diffusion. What is the MOST accurate example of this concept you could offer him?
    6·2 answers
  • her factors that are needed for development and financial ones. What types of means and resources are called financial resources
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!