In this case, they really are attempting to determine : <span>the unstated, primary causes of the conflict
When each parties that involved in the conflict started to analyze their opponent's interest, they will start to see things based on the opponent's point of view, so they will be more likely to create a compromise that benefits both of the parties.</span>
Yes, I think that identifying the purpose would increase the credibility of the source, so if we understand the "should" here as "would be good if, is recommended" - then this statement is true.
Including the intent of the information in the source will help place the information in a wider context - and often the context is necessary to fully understand the content of a source.
<u>Answer:</u>
With Facilitative leadership style, the leader presents the problem to a group of employees and seeks consensus on a solution, making sure that his or her own opinion receives no more weight than anyone else's.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- The act of leading group of people or organization is called a leadership. Facilitative leadership is goal oriented.
- It helps to build understanding among team member even if there is conflicting view.
- Member of team possess quality, wisdom, experience and the facilitator helps to bring these to the group.
- There is a proper coordination in a group. Group discussion is goal oriented.
- Facilitative make and implement decision and achieve high quality result.
Answer:
conservatives
Explanation:
got it right when i did it
