Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
The Appian Way is the famous paved road of ancient Rome.
Hello there,
To help the poor
1) Break down the social barriers between the rich and the poor
2) Give money to the poor
3) Improve public schools
To limit the power of the rich
1) Make sure they know their limits
2) Raise awareness amongst them to help others in need
Hope this helps :))
~Top
Answer:
Informal benchmarking
Explanation:
Generally, there are four different types of benchmarking.
Informal benchmarking: The term "informal benchmarking" is described as one of the different types of benchmarking that is being performed unconsciously by different people at home or work. However, it is an individual tendency to continuously learn and compare from the practices and behavior of another person including ways to play, use software program, or cook, etc.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the informal benchmarking.
Answer: be at least 25 years old, been a US citizen for at least 7 years, live in the state in which they are elected
Explanation:Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution sets three qualifications for representatives. Each representative must (1) be at least twenty-five years old, (2) have been a citizen of the United States for the past seven years, and (3) be (at the time of the election) an inhabitant of the state they represent.
