Answer:
? what is fahrenheit 50? is it like a book or sum?movie?
Explanation:
The correct answer to how the writer uses context clues to indicate the meaning of earnest is C. The writer uses antonyms of earnest.
In this passage, when the writer says <em>"Unlike many of the candidates"</em>, he or she implies that<em> the following adjectives that refer to them would be opposed to what Melissa delivered in her speech.</em> The candidates <em>"seemed insincere and uncaring"</em>, while <em>"Melissa delivered her speech in earnest"</em>. Therefore, <em>"insincere and uncaring" would be antonyms of "earnest"</em>, allowing the reader to infer the meaning of earnest. So, the correct answer would be C. The writer uses antonyms of earnest.
The correct answer couldn't be <em>A. The writer uses synonyms of earnest </em>because of the word<em> "unlike"</em>, which conveys that <em>the following words are not similar to earnest</em>. On the contrary,<em> the writer uses antonyms</em> to give clues about the meaning of earnest. Hence, the correct answer couldn't be A. The writer uses synonyms of earnest.
The correct answer couldn't be <em>B. The writer creates a picture that helps the reader understand the word</em> because the <em>writer doesn't create any pictures</em> in this passage, he or she <em>only uses descriptions</em> to refer to the other candidates' speeches and Melissa's speech. Therefore, the correct answer couldn't be B. The writer creates a picture that helps the reader understand the word.
The correct answer couldn't be<em> D. The writer rephrases the meaning, so the reader can (...)</em> because <em>the writer doesn't rephrase the word earnest</em>; there is <em>no explanation about it or any kind of alternative expressions</em> or explanations that could allow the reader to infer its meaning. So, the correct answer couldn't be D. The writer rephrases the meaning, so the reader can (...).
Answer: THE ANSWER IS C I DID IT
Explanation: I DID IT
Explanation:
To answer this question it would take pages to write, so I'll give you one example.
We need scientific apparatus because, people cannot understand anything in the universe beyond a very small are with our senses. For example, have you ever looked at the moon through a telescope, you can see almost every big crater on it, yet when you look at it with your eye, can you see anything besides a white sphere with an occasional rabbit? This is just our moon, the closest celestial object to us, Anywhere farther and you cannot see anything beyond a tiny dot in the sky without a telescope. This is one out of millions of reasons why we need scientfic apparatus to help us understand the universe.
The answer is
<span> The way a person might understand a story or bring it to life</span>
