In Schmerber v. California, the Court said that a search warrant was not necessary because of what?

2 answers:

4 0

I think you forgot to give the choices along with the question. I am answering the question based on my knowledge and research. In Schmerber v. California, the Court said that a search warrant was not necessary because )the officer did not have time to secure a warrant. I hope that the answer has come to your desired help.

Illusion [34]3 years ago

3 0

Their exact words were :
Search warrants no less could be required where intrusions into the human body are concerned.
This rule will be extremely needed if a case of Medical Emergency happened to the victim

hope this helps

You might be interested in

The justice argues that protecting false speech may

mestny [16]

Answer:

protect morality

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Trade routes and items traded show what key concept that changed the way people lived in 400AD?

professor190 [17]

D Religious syncretism

8 0

3 years ago

Which section from the text best supports the answer to part a

madam [21]

May I ask, what text? Why are so many people posting this type of question without adding the passage?!?

4 0

3 years ago

The Open Door policy was designed to:

Deffense [45]

Answer:

Explanation

Policy proposed in 1899 allowing countries to have equal trading oppurtunities with China.Hope this helps.

6 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which would probably not be considered part of the late twentieth-century information revolution

marta [7]

The one that cannot be considered as a part of the late twentieth-century information revolution is: a significant increase in the number of newspaper subscribers

 during the late twentieth-century information revolution, all form of information has been digitalized for people's convenient. So traditional reading form such as newspaper cannot be considered as a part of this.

3 0

3 years ago