Answer:
not sure 100% but Im leaning towards Baghdad
Wasn't relable and I believe sometimes malfuncted like blow ups and stuff
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You forgot to mention or attach the lenses that you refer to in the question. However, we can answer is general terms.
When we talk about the term "lens" in research, we are referring to a specific perspective to examine the topic at hand or the study. We can use philosophical lenses, economic, organizational, social, or psychological theories.
So we do not what lens you chose, but whatever your choice was, this lens might change how you approach researching your topic, thus affecting the historical narrative, because that particular approach is going to offer you different sources, authors, perspectives, and research lines to be followed. Your historic narrative would suffer modifications because you will have so many approaches to include in your research.
When addressing this question, there are two things that every history teacher is happy to see. The sinking of the Lusitania by the Germans was a spark along with the Zimmerman Telegraph by the Germans in an attempt to spark issues between Mexico an de the United States, this is when the United States joined the war. The most important moralist of all was President Woodrow Wilson—the man who dominated decision making so totally that the war has been labelled, from an American perspective, "Wilson's War". In 1917 Wilson won the support of most of the moralists by proclaiming "a war to make the world safe for democracy.
I hope this helps, God bless, and have a great day!
Brainliest is always appreciated :)
Pls mark as brainliest!! Hope this helps!
