Drag each idea to the thinker that would agree with it the most. Ideas can be used once or not at all.

1 answer:

7 0

1) The power to rule a country is given by God alone, and the monarch should be treated as God's chosen representative. NONE

2) People have rights as soon as they are born, and the government has a duty to protect these rights. (John Locke, notable for liberalism, freedom for all)

3) When societies form governments, people give up some of their rights in exchange for law and order. NONE

4) Religious wars have caused enough damage. Everyone should be allowed to practice their own religion. (Jean Jacques Rousseau, notable for emotional development, human development, and religious tolerance)

5) Tyranny is unavoidable when one person or group holds too much governmental power. (Baron de Montesquieu, notable for his advocacy towards the separation of government powers)

6) The best way for a nation to increase wealth is to remove all barriers to trade. (Adam Smith, notable for economics and finances)

You might be interested in

Many religious and intellectual leaders viewed the new science with suspicion, as shown by the catholic church's renunciation of

Vilka [71]

As shown by the catholic church's renunciation of Galileo.

7 0

3 years ago

Raj is starting college. he is well-rounded and adults in his life have told him that if he tries hard enough, he can be whateve

sashaice [31]

It would be a better choice because he can reach his unique potential and build self-esteem by building on his strengths and dominant talents.
Occupations such as accountant and lawyers tend to rely on things such as analytics and logic (left brain dominant)
Since Raj is more talented in using his imagination (right brain dominant), He would most lkely excel on occupations such as animator, writers, or song-writer.

5 0

3 years ago

two scientists failed to report unusual findings when they shared from a recent science expriment. Why is this not scientificall

Sedbober [7]

Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)

Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing unusual results, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.

reference

Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.

3 0

4 years ago

What is this one ??????

Natali5045456 [20]

D I’m pretty sure yea

8 0

3 years ago

Prophecy is never specific. True or False

Anna35 [415]

I think false. I am not sure