1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Neporo4naja [7]
3 years ago
10

Do you think that irredentism is more valid than imperialism?

History
2 answers:
Gwar [14]3 years ago
8 0
It depends on the situation, but in a definitional sense, irrendentism is more valid. 
alex41 [277]3 years ago
7 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

I think irredentism is more valid than imperialism because irredentism is the valid claim of people or nations to a lost territory conquered in the past by imperialistic ideas.

Imperialism is the idea powerful nations have to conquer and expand territories. Once these territories were conquered, the land is split according to political and economic interests. That is when irredentism, comes into place. People have the legit demand to claim their lands back because they originally belonged to them.

You might be interested in
Describe Davis ' early life.
Georgia [21]

Answer:

READ THAT I HOPE IT HELPED THANLS

4 0
3 years ago
If you know the lengths of opposid sides of a quadrilateral can you tell if its a paralleogram
Tom [10]
How is this a history question-
6 0
2 years ago
Please please I need help ASAP I only have a 30min
Gala2k [10]

Answer:The First one

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Why was the Gettysburg address forgotten in its time and remembered today?
lana [24]

It was forgotten in it's time because no one cared about being civil and listening to what EVERYONE wanted and being at peace with one another. They thought fighting in a war would help them simmer their dispute. Today, we don't fight over lands and things as much as we used to. While South America and North America are still fighting, *not in a huge war* it's not the same as it was then.

8 0
3 years ago
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! How did big businesses unfairly reduce competition in the marketplace?
IgorC [24]

Answer:

Anti-competitive practices are business or government practices that prevent or reduce competition in a market. In commercial law this can lead to unfair (or disloyal) competition, a deceptive business practice that causes economic harm to other businesses or to consumers.]The debate about the morality of certain business practices termed as being anti-competitive has continued both in the study of the history of economics and in the popular culture.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • An effect of Gamal Abdel Nasser's rule in Egypt was spreading of
    10·2 answers
  • What outcome did davis and lee expect from a confederate invasion of the north m
    14·1 answer
  • The phrase in the Declaration of Independence stating "that governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers fro
    13·2 answers
  • In this picture, Franklin Roosevelt is seated
    10·1 answer
  • How did the Treaty of Versailles affect post-war Germany?
    7·1 answer
  • Who were Gomastha ? <br><br><br> Plz answer
    8·2 answers
  • Diferencia entre dinastía qin y shang
    6·2 answers
  • How can we say the integers between 0 and 1 as infinite when it ends.​
    8·2 answers
  • I really need help with this im offering 100 points please help!!!!!!
    8·2 answers
  • Lemmie summon siri <br><br> :0 THERES A VIDEO ON HOW TO SUMMON A LEMON
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!