1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
xeze [42]
3 years ago
8

PLEASE HELP I NEED THIS NOW!!

History
1 answer:
suter [353]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: C

Explanation:

pls mark brainliest

You might be interested in
One reason the colonists had difficulty coming together to revolt against Britain is because they:
AnnyKZ [126]
<span>D. Lacked a unified army. Each colony had a militia which was made up of farmers and untrained men. The colonies had very few common factors pulling them together as a unit. To fight against the British meant fighting without the army that they once belonged or fighting with men that were untrained. Men were asked to join colonial militias which required them to leave their fields and work to fight for a dangerous cause against the British. </span>
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What would have happened if the south didn’t join the us after the civil war?
IRINA_888 [86]

Answer:

If the South had been allowed to secede, both North and South could have benefited. ... The South would have experienced the wrenching transition from a plantation economy based on slave labor to a manufacturing economy based on free labor. But after that transition, the South would have had a vibrant productive economy.

Explanation:

hope this helps

4 0
3 years ago
Delegates met in Philadelphia in 1787 to create a new government. Soon after the convention began, two competing plans for repre
aliya0001 [1]

Answer:

The Great Compromise gave the Senate Equal Representation for the Small States, and the House of Representatives Proportional Representation for the Large States. If a runaway slave is caught, he must be returned to his owner.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
The roman empire included all of europe, asia, and africa. <br> a. True <br> b. False
posledela
It is true that the roman empire includes large chunks of Europe, Asia and Africa, at it is height, rome ruled one of the largest empires in the world history and it is called Roman Empire. The emperors added so muc land to the empire to control hostile neighbors and some of the countries were threatening the rome from keeping then from attacking they conquered them.
3 0
4 years ago
6. Which characteristic of the 1920s is illustrated by the trial of Sacco and Vanzetti?
KiRa [710]

Answer:

D - intolerance toward immigrants

Explanation:

all of the other answers are false or don't make sense, but it can be verified via a search online anyway

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • If you mapped the spread of Renaissance culture, which urban centers would appear in the region shaded as the origin of the Rena
    8·1 answer
  • How did most Americans earn a living in 1800?
    8·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes Georgia’s Barrier Islands?
    11·2 answers
  • Which accurately describes the major cause of the French and Indian War?
    15·1 answer
  • Why did France come into conflict with great Britain in the early 1700s
    13·2 answers
  • Who was the last person to die who was in the soviet union
    9·1 answer
  • Why have corporations and unions been able to spend unlimited sums of
    13·1 answer
  • Who wrote The Code of Hammurabi?
    8·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ME <br> IM FREAKING OUT!!<br><br> What impact did the British Empire have on India?
    6·1 answer
  • 11th grade bs.. pls help
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!