1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yuradex [85]
3 years ago
14

In the late 1800s and early 1900s, violent riots were started in several Chinatowns by

History
2 answers:
spin [16.1K]3 years ago
8 0
They were started by anti-Chinese whites.
SVEN [57.7K]3 years ago
4 0

The answer is A.) Nativists who were angry and resentful of newcomers

Hope this helps:)

You might be interested in
How old was isaac newton when he became a professor of lucasian of mathematics?
Sholpan [36]
Issac Newton was the age of 26 when he became a professor of Lucian of mathematics. 
<span />
8 0
4 years ago
How to put those amandments in my own words for example like the first one plzz help
kipiarov [429]
Amendment ii is pretty controversial nowadays but basically, it says:
anyone has the right to own a weapon
<span>the law cannot house soldiers in citizen's homes without their consent
</span>you cannot search a home without a warrant and a reasonable belief that they are hiding something
5 0
3 years ago
What did Hillary Clinton say about education,healthcare,children?
erica [24]
There is one major country that does not guarantee health care to all people. There is one major country--the United States--which ends up spending almost three times per capita what they do in the U.K. guaranteeing health care to all people, 50 percent more than they do in France guaranteeing health care to all people, far more than our Canadian neighbors, who guarantee health care to all people
3 0
4 years ago
How do you feel about religion? Do you believe that it is impactful?
tekilochka [14]
Which religion would u be implying too?
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In your opinion, should civil and criminal cases require the same amount of proof? Why?
olchik [2.2K]
<span>Crimes are considered offenses against the state, or society as a whole. That means that even though one person might murder another person, murder itself is considered an offense to everyone in society. Accordingly, crimes against the state are prosecuted by the state, and the prosecutor (not the victim) files the case in court as a representative of the state. If it were a civil case, then the wronged party would file the case.Criminal offenses and civil offenses are generally different in terms of their punishment. Criminal cases will have jail time as a potential punishment, whereas civil cases generally only result in monetary damages or orders to do or not do something. Note that a criminal case may involve both jail time and monetary punishments in the form of fines.The standard of proof is also very different in a criminal case versus a civil case. Crimes must generally be proved "beyond a reasonable doubt", whereas civil cases are proved by lower standards of proof such as "the preponderance of the evidence" (which essentially means that it was more likely than not that something occurred in a certain way). The difference in standards exists because civil liability is considered less blameworthy and because the punishments are less severe.Criminal cases almost always allow for a trial by jury. Civil cases do allow juries in some instances, but many civil cases will be decided by a judge.A defendant in a criminal case is entitled to an attorney, and if he or she can't afford one, the state must provide an attorney. A defendant in a civil case is not given an attorney and must pay for one, or else defend him or herself.The protections afforded to defendants under criminal law are considerable (such as the protection against illegal searches and seizures under the 4th Amendment). Many of these well known protections are not available to a defendant in a civil case.</span>

 

In general, because criminal cases have greater consequences - the possibility of jail and even death - criminal cases have many more protections in place and are harder to prove.

The Same Conduct Can Produce Civil and Criminal Liability

Although criminal and civil cases are treated very differently, many people often fail to recognize that the same conduct can result in both criminal and civil liability. Perhaps one of the most famous examples of this is the OJ Simpson trial. The same conduct led to a murder trial (criminal) and a wrongful death trial (civil). In part because of the different standards of proof, there was not enough evidence for a jury to decide that OJ Simpson was guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt" in the criminal murder case. In the civil trial, however, the jury found enough evidence to conclude that OJ Simpson wrongfully caused his wife's death by a "preponderance of the evidence".

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the name of the leaders of the tainos and kalinagos called
    13·1 answer
  • Which country was the last to join the allied powers
    14·1 answer
  • What region is named Scotland?<br>a, b, c, d, or E???
    9·2 answers
  • A month after Abraham Lincoln's election to the presidency what state left the union
    6·1 answer
  • Establishment Of The Country são tomé and principe
    12·1 answer
  • In 1925, the Scopes Trial that took place in Dayton, Tennessee, represented a clash between what two ideas? individual rights an
    6·1 answer
  • Why were groups such as the federalist opposed to the war of 1812
    8·1 answer
  • How is educational inequality relate to the ongoing protests surrounding George Floy and police brutality?
    14·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP!!! I only have 13 minutes left
    13·1 answer
  • Plz help will make brainlyest.....
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!