Answer:
In the Roman Republic, a very complex civilization developed. Rome’s social structure was strict. Patricians were perched at the top of the social structure and slaves were at the bottom. In the middle, plebeians and freedmen were found. A person’s status in life was determined not only by his or her social class but also by gender and children. Women and children often had different rights and responsibilities than did men of any class in Rome.
Imagine that today’s texting technology was invented during the time in which the Roman Republic existed. What might a text message conversation between two Roman children be like? In this assignment, you will create the script for a text message conversation between a Roman child from the upper class and a Roman child from the lower class. Your fictional conversation should have at least a total of 10 messages between the two participants. Before you begin your assignment take a few minutes to review Level 1 of the Integrating Knowledge and Ideas into the Study of History Activity.
The text messages conversation must:
have a total of 10 text messages, each at least two complete sentences
describe the differences in the daily lives of upper class and lower class citizens
describe the opportunities for children in general in Rome
compare how life differed for female and male children in Rome
explain the effect of social status on one’s future in the Roman Republic
Use the cell phone template to create your conversation between the two children. While you can be creative in your dialogue, be sure that you write in complete sentences and that your script includes enough information and details to clearly explain what each child’s life is like.
Explanation:
Answer:
is there an option that says french influence or something about french influence?
Explanation:
tell me in the comments please
The answer is England and France. It was a series of wars that fought through
generations of dynasties for the throne of France. Many battles were fought and some
distinguished themselves in battle. The
phases of the war was divided into the Edwardian War, Caroline War and
Lancastrian War.
Answer:
Albert Jeremiah Beveridge (1862-1927) was a supporter of the United States imperialism overseas, he rapidly turned into an important voice in American foreign policy. Most of Beveridge's speech functioned through the notion of Manifest Destiny , Social Darwinism, evangelism, comercial ambition, and American patriotism. Beveridge firmly stablished his arguments in the themes of liberty and civilization.
Th main idea of the Manifest Destiny, which stated that the expansion of America was in accordance to divine providence, combined with the demonstration of liberal democracy for the benefit of all mankind, meaning that the United States was provided with a mission to initiate a nation set apart by God, which would expand its advanced politics, economics, culture and religion into the world.
Manifest Destiny influenced Beveridge's reasoning in three determining ways: First, it assists his notion of Anglo-Saxon racial superiority. He believed that his race came from the Teutons, he outlined attributes that gave the Anglo-American race its undeniable superiority. In addition, Manifest Destiny gave Beveridge the idea that white Americans were God's chosen people. With God on their side, Americans replaced natives and expanded across the continent in the name of civilization.
Second, Manifest Destiny promoted Beveridge's argument for expansion as a fundamental part of God's arrangements. If the project of expansion was not attended, European powers would obtain the territories God had specifically assigned to American protection.
Finally, Manifest Destiny gave Beveridge a more ethical reason to participate in imperial actions beyond the reasoning of commercial dominion. American citizens believed God had also blessed the nation by its separation from the rest of the world's problems. By the late 1800s, involvement in the world's affairs meant that America could achieve the riches promised throughout the centuries to God's chosen people.
Explanation:
One similarity in the rule of Akbar the Great and <span>the rule of Elizabeth I is that both leaders implemented policies that encouraged religious toleration, but to different extents. </span>
