1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
horrorfan [7]
3 years ago
8

French encroachment into Texas began to worry the Spanish.

History
2 answers:
Marta_Voda [28]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

It is true

Explanation:

I did it on edgenuity and false is wrong

gladu [14]3 years ago
5 0

The answer should be F. On October 25, 1693, Spain ended its first attempt to settle Texas. The French no longer appeared to be a threat in Texas.

You might be interested in
Who or what caused the Salem witch trials?
deff fn [24]

The infamous Salem witch trials began during the spring of 1692, after a group of young girls in Salem Village, Massachusetts, claimed to be possessed by the devil and accused several local women of witchcraft. ... By September 1692, the hysteria had begun to abate and public opinion turned against the trials.

8 0
3 years ago
What was the largest fear of statehood for California?
Alina [70]
The largest fear was the position on the slave issue. The pro and anti slavery advocates feared that the addition of California to the Union could cause a senate majority on the other side. The territory was left without a formal government after a debate within the senate and failed the amendments about the addition of California.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
.<br> What is fur trading? Why were beavers fur trade is so<br> popular?<br> tofur trade 2
krok68 [10]

Answer:

The Indians traded furs for such goods as tools and weapons. Beaver fur, which was used in Europe to make felt hats, became the most valuable of these furs. The fur trade prospered until the mid-1800's, when fur-bearing animals became scarce and silk hats became more popular than felt hats made with beaver.

7 0
3 years ago
Who is our third president
Lostsunrise [7]
Thomas Jefferson was our third president
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Did the Native Americans believe that acquiring possessions was an important goal?
ohaa [14]

Answer:

Explanation:At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.  

In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.

What complicates the story further is that (again, unlike other minorities seeking recognition of their civil rights) Indians have possessed some valuable reservation land and resources over which white Americans have cast envious eyes. Much of this was subsequently lost and, as a result, the history of Native Americans is often presented as a morality tale. White Americans, headed by the federal government, were the ‘bad guys’, cheating Indians out of their land and resources. Native Americans were the ‘good guys’, attempting to maintain a traditional way of life much more in harmony with nature and the environment than the rampant capitalism of white America, but powerless to defend their interests. Only twice, according to this narrative, did the federal government redeem itself: firstly during the Indian New Deal from 1933 to 1945, and secondly in the final decades of the century when Congress belatedly attempted to redress some Native American grievances.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What helped Franklin Roosevelt beat Herbert Hoover in the 1932 election? Roosevelt was dedicated to women's liberation. As gover
    10·2 answers
  • What kind of immigration rules did the united states have before the 1880s?
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following best describes greek tragedy?
    7·2 answers
  • In what ways did Europeans owe some of the sailing technology to other peoples?
    12·1 answer
  • How did periods of isolation followed by contact with other countries affect Japan?
    14·1 answer
  • What was King Leopold hoping to accomplish in the Congo River Basin?​​
    11·1 answer
  • Discuss some of the issues the Clinton presidency faced during his two terms and their outcome? 2-4 sentences.
    10·1 answer
  • What caused WWII? (Please help me)
    10·2 answers
  • Use the drop-down menus to complete the sentences. The Camp David Accords were a negotiation of peace between and Israel. Prime
    6·1 answer
  • What were the similarities between Oliver Cromwell and King Charles reign<br>​
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!