Hm, this is not an easy question.
Generally the best way to prevent a nuclear disaster is not to have any weapons, so A would be a good option. But in the modern world, complete destruction of all weapons is not feasible, and people believe that since US and Russia limited their number of weapons, this is no longer such a big concern (option D, which is I think the best. Personally, however I faviour A as a solution to the problem of nuclear weapons).
While some peasants sought to topple the old order, others resisted efforts bring about change.
Answer:
????? is this even a question? if not please keep it to yourself
Explanation:
