Option C. The way that the Phoenician culture was different from most other ancient civilizations was that Their economy relied more heavily on trade than on agriculture.
<h3>What was the Phoenician culture?</h3>
This was the Semitic language speaking people that lived in the Eastern part of the Mediterranean.
They were located mostly in the Eastern part of Lebanon. They were a people that got a lot from trade.
Read more on the Phoenician culture here:
brainly.com/question/1753095
#SPJ1
Treaty of Greenville was a peace treaty between the United States and Native Indians of the U.S. Northwest Territory. Treaty of Colerain outlined friendly terms which was signed between the US Government and the Creek people.
Explanation:
Treaty of Greenville ended the Native American war facilitating the expansion further into the west. But in true it failed to put an end to the relentless conflict that occurred between the Native Americans and American Settlers.
Treaty of Colerain is a peace treaty and a treaty of friendship that was outlined between the US government and the Creek nations. The administration of Washington had already came into a friendly terms with the Creek people however, factually the people of Cherokee nation ended up in having an endless scuffle with the Government because, they were not given priority amidst the settlers.
Rights are in the Declaration of Independance- and the US Constitution!
The King's family saved his life and spared him the death penalty.
Alberta Williams King, the mother of Martin Luther King, Jr. was shot and killed during a church service by Marcus Wayne Chenault six years after the association of her son (1974). She was 69 years old.
Her killer was a 23-year-old, college drop-out, black man from Ohio. He stated that he shot Mrs. King because she was a Christian and all Christians 'were his enemies'. His original target was Martin Luther King Sr., but he aimed at his wife because she was seated closer to him.
Chenault was sentenced to death but it was because of the King's family that his life was spared. The Kings are firmly opposed to the death penalty so they pushed for his sentence to be changed into life in prison. Chanault died in prison some years later after suffering a stroke.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/11974139#readmore
Scarcity is the fundamental challenge that all individuals and nations must confront. Everyone faces some limitations, so we all have to make choices where we limit or allow ourselves to something.
Economists generally recognize four types of economic systems traditional, traditional, command, market and mixed.
A traditional economic system is shaped by tradition. The work that people do, the goods and services they provide, how they exchange resources… all tend to follow a pattern. The traditional system is bad at addressing scarcity because scarcity is formed off of new requirements people have through the ages and a traditional system would not evolve just as our requirements would.
In a planned economy, the government controls the economy. The state decides how to use and distribute resources. The government regulates prices and wages; it may even determine what sorts of work individuals do.
Socialism is a prime example of a planned economy. Socialism does not work because it is not consistent with the fundamental principles of human behavior. The failure of socialism in countries around the world can be traced to one critical defect: it is a system that ignores incentives.
Market economies allow all economic decisions to be made by individuals. The unrestrained interactions between individuals and companies in the marketplace determine what happens to all the good and resources.Individuals choose how to invest their personal resources and individuals decide what to consume. Within a pure market economy, the government is entirely absent from economic affairs.
A mixed economic system combines elements of the market and command economy. Many economic decisions are made in the market by individuals. But the government also plays a role in the allocation and distribution of resources.
If scarcity is looked at on a macro level, the best economic system is mixed because it allows the government to also plays a role in the allocation and distribution of resources, while the individuals still stay happy because they have some control. The only problem is the eternal question of what the right mix between the public and private sectors of the economy should be.
There is no point to look at it on a micro level because almost no country is small enough to be considered on that level.
