What were the differences between the two plans?

2 answers:

6 0

Here is the answer for the differences between the Virginia plan and the New Jersey plan.

Virginia plan advocated two legislative houses of which membership would be based on population. New Jersey plan advocated one legislative house, membership in which would be equal for all states.

insens350 [35]3 years ago

4 0

What plans? There’s nothing here.

You might be interested in

Why did the Dutch become very successful merchants in the spice trade between Asia and Europe during the 1600s

Leto [7]

I would say c but check with your book jus in case

7 0

3 years ago

How and when did the united states begin to eatend its innuence in America?

Alexxx [7]

In 1781 end of the revolutionary war

8 0

2 years ago

What accounts for the success of absolutism in some parts of Europe and its failure

Ghella [55]

Answer:

Because even if the Absolutism has similarities and was applied in almost the entire Europe, each country modeled its conceptions to adapt to reality. And this reality could be social, political or religious.

Explanation:

I believe that the better way to understand this point is analyzing the two major countries where the Absolutism was strong: France and England.

France was ruled by Louis XIV in the 17th century. He describes himself as "The state is me" (“L'Etat c'est Moi”). This monarch is the main definition of the absolutist ruler. To support his government, Louis XIV follows the idea of Divine Right of Kings which argued that the monarch had divine powers and was elected by God. Thus, his actions and laws were divine and couldn't be disrespected. The question is: why this conception worked in France? Because it was a catholic country, and religious perceptions were followed without question. Plus, Louis XIV had no limits in his powers. I mean, there was no law or political scheme that could limit him.
On the contrary, in England, the king was subjected to the Parlament. However, only this restriction was not sufficed to limit his power. The main point is that the British kings followed the idea of a social contract (popularized by the philosopher Thomas Hobbes). This idea attests that a king has duties with its people, and the Parlament was always remembering him about this. So, he couldn't do whatever he wanted.

8 0

3 years ago

10) Select THREE reasons why the Abbasid Caliphate was the Golden Age of the Islamic Empire.

ANEK [815]

Answer:

Siege on Baghdad by the Mongols led by Hulagu Khan ... Like the Umayyad Caliphate before it, the leader of the Abbasids was called the caliph. ... The Abbasid Caliphate had two major periods. ... The Abbasid Caliphate ruled over a large empire that included the Middle ... It is often referred to as the Golden Age of Islam.

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

What was one effect of the fugitive slave act of 1850

nikitadnepr [17]

Answer:

Passed on September 18, 1850 by Congress, The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was part of the Compromise of 1850. The act required that slaves be returned to their owners, even if they were in a free state. The act also made the federal government responsible for finding, returning, and trying escaped slaves

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers