A part of this power struggle was the opposition between power structures of the Soviet Union and the RSFSR. ... On 12 July 1990, Yeltsin resigned from the CPSU in a dramatic speech before party members at the 28th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, some of whom responded by shouting "Shame!"
Germany was expected to pay $132 billion gold marks for war damages
Part of the debate over rights in the 18th century involved the prerogative of kings to remove and appoint judges upon their ascension to the throne. Liberal thinkers believed that lifetime appointments would scale back the power of the king, and therefore represented social progress. If a judge was sure of his seat, he could vote according to his own judgment, despite the wishes of the king. The Whigs in Britain actually won this right, though whether it really served their cause or their government is anyone's guess.
I believe it was Brigham Young and I believe they settled in Utah that of which they latter tried to separated from the USA.
Answer:
The answer is that separate facilities for white and black people was constitutional as long as the facilities were equal.
Explanation:
Separate but equal was a legal doctrine in American constitutional law that justified systems of segregation.
Under this doctrine, services, facilities and public accommodations were allowed to be separated by race, on the condition that the quality of each group’s public facilities was to remain equal.
Although the Constitutional doctrine required equality, the facilities and social services offered to African-Americans were almost always of lower quality than those offered to white Americans.
The doctrine of “separate but equal” was legitimized in the 1896 Supreme Court case, Plessy v. Ferguson.
