A lot of countries had totalitarian leaders during this time, such as Germany (Hitler), Italy (Mussolini), Japan (Tojo), Spain (Franco), Portugal (Salazar), and possibly many others, too.
Carl Jung work would Penelope likely cite to explain the observation.
Option D
<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>
There is frequent appearance of some characters, though the fact that the cultures Penelope is studying had little or no connection with each other. So, its most likely that Penelope would refer to Carl Jung's concept of archetypes, as he has been associated with such similarities.
As Jung states, these archetypes are collective unconscious of the common content that is being observed. Such common contents have their different appearance in myths, dreams, art, and stories. Also, such characters appear in literature and can be traced back to myths such as the hero.
Answer:
Both were conquered by Spanish conquistadors
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I am going to take into consideration the 1st. Amendment to the United States Constitution.
It is true that the federal government must often balance protecting individual liberties and providing for order and security. We have seen how, at times, priority is given to one over the other, depending on the circumstances.
However, according to my thinking and belief systems, the federal government should always place more emphasis on protecting individual liberties. Just when the exceptional case is necessary, then the federal government must provide for order and security.
As stated in the 1st. Amendment, citizens must always have their freedom of speech and freely express what they believe is right; this includes reasonable critics of the economic and political systems, as well as to highlight positive attributes too.
Respecting the differences has always been a trademark for true democracies.
It is understandable that in times of conflict, as was the case of WWI and WWII, the government has put restrictions on certain liberties.
Some would say that the September 11 attacks justify the creation of the type of surveillance the government placed on the citizens, but that is when a fine line was crossed between protection and "espionage" without the consent of the citizens.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
I think it is exploratory.
Hope it helps:-D
