The Supreme Court was affirming the point that states (not the federal government) should be in charge of the voting procedures in their states.The Supreme Court decision you're referring to, which invalidated pre-clearance conditions, was Shelby County v. Holder (2013). "Pre-clearance" meant that certain states, according to the Voting Rights Acts of 1965, had to get approval in advance from federal authorities for any changes they made to their state regulations regarding voting. That standard had been applied to several states because they had displayed discriminatory practice in their voting laws. The decision in Shelby County v. Holder held that the federal government could not keep applying that requirement on the basis of decades-old data.
I recently posted another answer on Shelby County v. Holder, which you can check out too. Read more on Brainly.com -
brainly.com/question/9069264#readmore
Answer:
Here are a few of the pivotal moments that led to the American Revolution.
The Stamp Act (March 1765) ...
The Townshend Acts (June-July 1767) ...
The Boston Massacre (March 1770) ...
The Boston Tea Party (December 1773) ...
The Coercive Acts (March-June 1774) ...
Lexington and Concord (April 1775)
Explanation:
C. Philosophes
Thats some we call an 18th century thinker who believed in wisdom.
It can help develop tourism economy
Reformation I think, Marin Luther wrote an essay and stapled it to the church and basically told the pope to leave people alone, that Christians don't need the pope, fathers, or anything they can find God on their own. and they didn't need to be ruled by the church and the church shouldnt have so much political power to the point they are stronger then the king
