The statement that shows how the two-party political system supports a democratic form of government includes, "The two-party system assures at least two candidates with different ideas will run at local, state, or national levels."
This is true because having the candidates have different ideas across all levels of government is a form of democratic principle. These different ideas were formed from varying citizens' choices and what could benefit them.
Also, the other statement that shows how the two-party political system supports a democratic form of government is that "the two-party system allows for a range of ideas within the political spectrum: left, center, and right."
This also enhances democratic principles as different voices, opinions and choices would be considered and decided upon.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is options A and C.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/18682200
The Whig theory, put into place after the Glorious Revolution, put a premium on the idea of civic virtue, placing the public good above personal interest. To promote such virtue, one needed a society in which property ownership was widespread. An agricultural nation, where farming was thought to encourage honesty, frugality, and independence, was less likely to become corrupt than a society dependent on commerce and manufacturing. In an agrarian society, politics would be less fractious because everyone's interest would be similar. In such a society representatives would be less fractious because everyone's interest would be similar. In such a society representatives would be equally affected by whatever laws they passed. This would prevent them from tyrannizing over the people by passing oppressive laws.
<span>The Whig view of politics was not democratic. It assumed that only men who owned property had a sufficient permanent stake in society to be trusted to vote.</span>
The answer to this question is letter B. Slavery was abolished and voting rights were extended to all male citizens.
Hope this helped!
Well, (the way I see it) when Southern Brewers was the only coffee supplier in the market. They could have prices as high as they'd liked, where else would people get good coffee. And so, Albert Coffee than comes along charging less than the leading supplier. And than Café Brites comes and marks their prices lower than the both of them.
Southern Brewers had to lower prices in order to keep up business. People are more apt to buy low cost idems. So if they wanted to continue being a top supplier, they needed to lower prices.
