Answer:
After creation of Italy and Germany as independent countries there was a wide disagreement between them and countries that were colonial powers. That is why two military blocks were created so that countries could defend their interests.
Explanation:
Two alliances were created. On one side there was Entente (Russia, Britain and France), while on the other there were Central Powers (Germany, Italy, Austria-Hungary). Most of the countries felt that large and efficient military is a base for the development of country. That and strong of national pride were two main premises. That is why this period of large differences fueled by this factors led to beginning of WW1.
Lowering the land. The Dust Bowl affected Iowa by blowing strong gust towards West/Central Iowa. It caused food shortages and caused many farmers to abandon their homes and head to the west. They could not eat because there was so much dirt in the food. People were wasting their money on food when they wouldn't even eat it. They had to kill jackrabbits by capturing them in a fence and people would hop over, kill them, and then eat them afterwards. If you would like to read a fascinating book about the Dust Bowl era, try The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of <span>Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl. It read like a novel but is sadly true.
Hope it helps!</span>
These would be referred to as echo boomers. They are the children of baby boomers
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
