A certain town has a lively, active downtown shopping district, but it is crowded with automobile traffic. Some citizens think t
hat the town council should bar traffic from the central street in the shopping district, turning it into a pedestrians-only plaza. A town council member makes a speech in favor of the proposal. Which statements represent valid reasoning and which statements represent invalid reasoning?
Label as
Valid Reasoning Invalid Reasoning
Barring motor vehicles from the central area will help reduce air pollution and noise pollution.
Studies predict that shopping activity in the area will increase if cars are prohibited.
At a dinner I attended recently, someone complained loudly about the number of cars in the shopping district.
Many cities of our size have downtowns that are only active during workdays, not on evenings or weekends.
Hello, sorry this is a little late, but hopefully it can help others who visit this question!
I believe the correct answers to your question would be:
Valid Reasons: "Barring motor vehicles from the central area will help reduce air pollution and noise pollution." and "Studies predict that shopping activity in the area will increase if cars are prohibited."
Invalid Reasons: "At a dinner I attended recently, someone complained loudly about the number of cars in the shopping district." and "Many cities of our size have downtowns that are only active during workdays, not on evenings or weekends." I can confirm these answers are 100% correct!
If my answer at all helped you, please remember to click 'Thanks' and Rate my answer however you feel appropriate! You do not need a Brainly account to do this :)
Hope this helped, and have a lovely rest of your day!
