Option A. The disadvantage that secondary sources have is that they are created by people who have never experienced the historical period they describe.
<h3>What is meant by secondary sources?</h3>
This is the term that is used to describe the data that are known to already be in existence. These are the types of data that can be gotten from journals or from large government data base.
These types of data are very unlike the primary data that the researcher has to source and create for himself. The primary data would be gotten directly from the field by the researcher who wants to carry out an experiment to determine a phenomenon.
Read more on secondary data here: brainly.com/question/14806486
#SPJ1
Complete question
Which of the following describes a disadvantage secondary sources have compared to primary sources? A.They are created by people who have never experienced the historical period they describe. B.They are extremely rare and much harder for historians to locate. C.They do not rely on historical evidence to support their conclusions. D.They focus too closely on a single piece of evidence instead of providing summaries.
Answer:
Both regions required the importation of immense numbers of laborers to produce in-demand cash crops that could only be grown in warm-weather climates
Explanation:
I know this answer is correct because I a 2/2 (100%) on this section of the test. There is further proof that this answer is correct in the file attached. :)
I believe 1,500 sqr miles?
The correct answer is - the Fertile Crescent.
From what is discovered so far, the place where the first agricultural communities appeared and people started to settle permanently and develop as a civilization, is the so called Fertile Crescent in the Middle East. The fertile Crescent was located between and around (in very close proximity) the rivers of Tigris and Euphrates.
Answer:
he was the first president of the United States, serving from 1789 to 1797
Explanation:
