The following part from the artilce justifies the answer choice:
shakespeare’s early plays were marked by a crude—almost vulgar—style that is so far from what we think of as “shakespeare” that most people have never even heard of the plays, much less seen them performed. his early tragedy titus andronicus is as bloody (and stupid) as any gory horror movie now seen at the cineplex. shortly after his blockbuster success with the early history/tragedy richard iii, shakespeare wrote his greatest plays, the ones everyone knows, at least by title: julius caesar, hamlet, othello, macbeth, and king lear. but great as these plays are, they too often have weak spots. hamlet, as any director will tell you, is far too long—the longest play shakespeare wrote and is full of digressions and long topical speeches that are incomprehensible to anyone but a person of shakespeare’s day and age
The author uses third-person point of view to tell the overall story, but she uses second-person point of view for a moment to speak to the readers and tell them that they will learn about the Children's March through participants' stories. The people who were there get to tell their stories and express their viewpoints and opinions about the events.
