The article shows how frontline professionals are in a situation of insecurity. This can cause these professionals to be influenced to leave their posts. For this reason, the situation must be treated with rationality and understanding.
<h3>How does the article address the issue of frontline professionals?</h3>
- The article shows that frontline professionals have been overwhelmed during the pandemic.
- The article shows that their workday has been very exhausting.
- The article shows that they have taken risks during the pandemic.
- The article shows that the population has blamed these professionals.
- The article shows that the population has made the population's work difficult.
The situation of frontline professionals has been something very delicate, because, in addition to the exhausting work, the population has not contributed to the comfort of these professionals, insulting and attacking them.
This requires a rational and objective positioning, where the population understands the importance of the work of these professionals and the need to contribute to good service and reduction of cases.
More information about the pandemic at the link:
brainly.com/question/2655465
Decades hope this is helpfull!!
Explanation:
external conflicts are when a character vs nature, society, technology, or another character. internal conflicts are when a character vs himself or herself. internal and external conflicts can make a character think or act a certain way to reveal a theme. external conflicts are identified by looking for what is stopping the character other than themselves. internal conflicts are identified by looking why and how the character is holding themselves back. Hopefully this helps you understand this concept better.
Working in a fast production line requires not only physical strength and quick reflexes but presence of mind. In instances when the operating machine jams, you need to decide quickly to either temporarily pause the production and call an expert to fix the machine to avoid further delays or fix the machine by yourself. The first option is the more sensible one.
Well I'll just hit it kinda vaguely to hit it all at once. So imagine you do something nice for a person, like buy them a gift or a present, that will cause a fondness and a bond between that person and you, which in turn establishes a relationship. Pretty much, in order to cause a relationship, you have to establish a positive bond with the person or some kind of being. The effect of having a relationship would be something like a deeper trust in others, improvement of the same or other relationships, increased happiness and so on. (I'm just assuming that these are all positive relationships.) So, an example would be like, you see a nice girl/guy, you talk to them and become good friends which would result in establishing a relationship. After establishing a relationship, your relationship would become more intimate and you would become better friends, or maybe even become partners. You can even get a negative relationship by creating a negative relation, then as a result it would be a toxic relationship. The toxic relationship would then result in it being harmful.
