1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
il63 [147K]
3 years ago
6

Which problem was significant for the Texas army in the early 1836​

Social Studies
2 answers:
aleksandrvk [35]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Hi nohelia

Explanation:

The defeat at the Alamo in 1836 was significant for Texas because it gave the Texans a reason for fighting for their independence. The small number of Texans that fought the war at Alamo were tortured and killed and this led to a greater stimulus for gaining independence from the rule of Mexico for the Texans.

The Battle of the Alamo (February 23 – March 6, 1836) was a pivotal event in the Texas Revolution. ... Buoyed by a desire for revenge, the Texians defeated the Mexican Army at the Battle of San Jacinto, on April 21, 1836, ending the rebellion.

Radda [10]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

A significant problem for the Texas Army in the early 1836 was a lingering loyalty toward Mexico by some of its men.

Explanation:

The independence of Texas from Mexico took place on March 2, 1836. Texas, until then, belonged to Mexico, although many of its inhabitants were of American origin, which is why the territory ended up being annexed to the United States.

But while there was a large majority of Texans who wanted to separate from Mexico and join the United States, a minor (but not insignificant) group had some degree of sympathy for Mexico and did not want an open struggle against the country (some even wanted to remain part of that nation). This made that at the beginning of the conflict there were internal struggles within the army of Texas, which ended up having an impact on the initial results in battle.

You might be interested in
Someone plz help me I beg u
Angelina_Jolie [31]

Answer:

im pretty sure its the second one i might be wrong tho

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
The reliability of a test relates to its _____________, whereas the validity of a test relates to its _____________.
Setler79 [48]

Answer: Consistency and Accuracy

Explanation:

Consistency tends to prove how reliable a test can be while to know it's validity we check how accurate it it is.

7 0
3 years ago
Is problematic for classical statistical tests that assume independently distributed errors.
goldenfox [79]

Regression is problematic for classical statistical tests that assume independently distributed errors.

Regression is a statistical technique that relates a dependent variable to one or more independent (explanatory) variables. A regression model can indicate whether an observed change in the dependent variable is associated with changes in one or more of the explanatory variables.

Regression comes from "regress", which comes from the Latin word "regresses" – (to return to something). In this sense, regression is a technique that allows us to move from chaotic and difficult-to-interpret data to a clearer and more meaningful model.

Regression analysis predicts a continuous dependent variable from a set of variables. Used when the independent variable. If your dependent variable is dichotomous, you should use logistic regression.

Learn more about Regression brainly.com/question/26843436

#SPJ4

8 0
1 year ago
On what basis did Andrew Jackson claim Texas was part of the United States?
Scorpion4ik [409]
The answer is D! hope it helped
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Adding premises to an inductive argument can make it go from strong to weak Adding new premises to an inductive argument can mak
expeople1 [14]

Answer:

This statement is CORRECT: <u>One can keep adding premises to inductive arguments to make them go from strong to weak, then back to strong again, etc.</u>

Explanation:

The inductive reasoning is based on how the the premises are built, in order for them to lead us to a conclusion. This is why building the right premises can lead to a week or strong argument.

The process of builing a inductive argument is based on specific observations or statements into more general aspects. Although strong premises can lead to strong arguments, they do not garantee the conclusion would be true.

In logic, inductive argument it is not classify as valid or invalid, it is strong or weak according to the premises. The premises can be testable for instance, or they can come from observation.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 10pts and BRAINLIEST ONLY IF YOU GET IT RIGHT
    10·2 answers
  • wich of the following soils has roughest texture. f potting soil. g silt. h. clay. j sand
    6·2 answers
  • Angelique has not left her house for two years. she is completely terrified of going out. she is probably suffering from
    7·1 answer
  • Genes are carried from parents to offspring on structures called
    12·2 answers
  • is the psychological discomfort a person experiences when simultaneously holding two or more conflicting cognitions. Select one:
    10·1 answer
  • Refer to the same recording ( "The Cuckoo's Hornpipe"). The names of the ornaments used in Irish traditional pieces of this kind
    9·1 answer
  • Which statements best communicate the main idea of this speech? Check all that apply.
    9·2 answers
  • What was one result related to the advent of the cotton gin?
    5·1 answer
  • Please help with one question
    7·1 answer
  • A primary group is a small group that is
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!