Britain was blockading US ports, taking our impending our sailors, and hurting trade.
Answer:
This brief statement ensures justice and rights for all, for free and in a timely fashion. The delay of justice and the taking of bribes for favorable trial outcomes are both confronted in this section.
Explanation: :))
I'll give you some thoughts on the political views of the thinkers named. It's up to you to search for images and write your descriptions.
Aristotle believed there were three valid types of government, depending on the size and scope of what was to be governed or upon local situations. (He studied the constitutions of various governments as part of his work in writing <em />his work, <em>Politics.</em>) As state with a sole ruler ruling rightly is a monarchy. If that form of state is abused, it becomes tyranny. A state with a number of members of the ruling class is an aristocracy -- rule by the excellent ones, noble men suited for governing. If it is corrupted by having a few rule but not of noble character or in a noble way, Aristotle referred to that as an oligarchy (rule by a few). A state in which all worthy men participate in governing Aristotle termed a polity, a constitutional government. He saw it as a corruption, though, to have a full democracy (rule by the people), which would become the sort of thing we call mob rule.
Aquinas picked up thoughts from Aristotle, who had favored a monarchy. Aquinas, writing from a Christian perspective, wrote about the righteous and proper sort of ruler who would serve as God's appointed leader among the people, truly caring for them (not becoming a tyrant).
Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx were partners in establishing communism as a political ideology. Engels and Marx believed that in time, class struggles between overlords and those beneath them would give way to a society in which all ruled and lived and worked collectively.
We can only theorize about how the life would be if the humans appeared earlier on the Earth, as we can not create a perfect and accurate picture of how would the things have been.
If the humans were developing in the same manner as we had, than we can say that the humans would have been much more advanced. The technology would have much better, probably missions to the other planets would have been regular. The population would probably be higher, with most of the population being concentrated in highly advanced megalopolises.
The environment though would probably be in a terrible condition, with enormous loss in biodiversity across the globe, decline in the forests, and much emptier (with life) oceans. On the other hand, there's every chance that with the more advanced technology multiple animals and plants would have been resurrected, even some extinct very long time ago.
