I believe your answer is (<span>A) justify a war to extend the borders of the United States. I hope this helps! :)
Have a great rest of the day.
</span>
Belief in the ideas of the Enlightenment<span> and discontent </span>within the Third<span> Estate </span>were causes<span> of. The French Revolution. In the early 18th century, the Agricultural Revolution in Great Britain resulted in urbanization because. displaced rural workers migrated to find jobs.</span>
<h3>
<u>Question:</u></h3>
All of the following are formal or informal sources of presidential power except
a. presidential authority to raise revenue
b. presidential access to the media
c. precedents set during previous administrations
d. public support
e. the constitution
<h3><u>
Answer:</u></h3>
All the mentioned options are formal or informal sources of Presidential power except the Presidential authority to raise revenue.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
The powers to raise a revenue is not given to the presidential authority. This is because raising funds occurs when a bill is passed from both the houses of the parliament. A direct implementation of the raise in revenue in a democratic country by a single person or authority would be a sign of dictatorship.
Living in the world's largest democracy, a single raise in any tax or revenue is gone through two houses of the parliament and then it is approved by the government. It is a chain that works and not a single person or authority.
The body of law that involves disputes between private parties is called,
Civil Law System
I hope you were able to find this helpful, have a nice day. :)
Answer:
Explanation:
He compares the role of a supreme court justice to that of an umpire in baseball or a referee in football or hockey.
He says for example, that those neutrals would never favor a team for person reasons. A team would never get unfair treatment if they were in a do or die match and had not been in such a match for 50 or more years while their opponents had one this match multiple times. Such behavior would be unthinkable.
He stated that one must uphold the rules as given to him. The idea of a referee or umpire falls apart a little here, but a supreme court justice is not obligated to uphold rules which are unconstitutional. His job is to fairly judge what should be decided. It does not matter what his own thoughts on abortion might be: he must rule on what the constitution would say about such matters.
Sometimes it is not always easy.
