1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aksik [14]
3 years ago
14

Which statment would most likely be made by an opponet of affirmitive action

History
1 answer:
Ber [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: People can have multiple reasons why they oppose Affirmative Action. Some are more common than others.

Explanation:

One common reason is priviledge they hold and not knowing that Affirmative Action is meant as a means of reparation for POC or other underpriviledged groups of people. They don't understand this and then get upset when they believe their opportunities are going away.

You might be interested in
This political cartoon is from 1915: A political cartoon shows a political boss conducting a chorus with a woman wearing a dress
IgorLugansk [536]
<span>Political bosses were against women's suffrage because they feared women might use their votes to end corruption.

this was mostly the case, or else political bosses would have given women the right to vote a long time ago

hope this helps</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP ME OUT!!!!!
Lostsunrise [7]

Answer:

There are two opposing views on the Manhattan project. One, see it as one of United States greatest achievements from Second World War while others view it as a crime against humanity. Let's discuss this in detail.

Explanation:

Many hold the point of view that the Manhattan project resulted in the development of the deadliest weapon in history. It resulted in the deaths of more than a 100,000 people in Japan and continues to be a problem in the world today.

The other point of view is that the Manhattan project was necessary and if  American had not developed it, the Germans would have, which would have made it a much more dangerous place. Supporters also point out to how it helped in the development of clean nuclear energy and nuclear medical science which benefits everyone today.

Personally, I agree that it was, at least, a necessary evil, which has protected the country and gave us tons of other benefits.

3 0
3 years ago
Losing favor after 1828, the earliest method of nominating candidates for office was the legislative _____.
Anna007 [38]
Losing favor after 1828, the earliest method of nominating candidates for office was the legislative caucus. The correct option among all the options given in the question is option "A". The actual meaning of caucus in terms of politics is the gathering of supporters of a common political party. Although the term appeared in the United States of America, but later on it spread to other countries like Australia, Canada etc.
3 0
3 years ago
What does if mean to reform something?
MArishka [77]

Answer:

to make something be better again

Explanation:

i dont know for sure but it makes the most sense

4 0
2 years ago
In addition to getting a large salary, what does the king receive ?
photoshop1234 [79]
He gets land because he is the ruler of the land.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was the northwest ordinance of 1787?
    15·1 answer
  • Which do you think is more reliable – a secondary source or a primary source?
    12·1 answer
  • 15 PTS!!
    14·2 answers
  • Why is politics so important to the running of government
    14·1 answer
  • Which is a reason why the two major political parties do not have a strong central organizing structure?
    13·2 answers
  • What determines the value of fiat currency?
    8·2 answers
  • 1. How did WWII have an impact on Modern World geopolitics and was the United States again responsible for saving the world?​
    9·1 answer
  • What are three events that occurred during Washington's terms in office?
    9·1 answer
  • How did conflicts within Washingtons cabinet affect American politics?(2 paragraphs)
    10·1 answer
  • To determine whether a piece of historical evidence is reliable, historians
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!