Answer:
conflict and drama can indeed result in bias and alternation in history.
what the question is asking you is that in the given subject of your question, is there some kind of conflict, aruging, and fighting, such as drama and arguments that has driven to bias and uses unlogical reasonings and emotional based answers.
Explanation:
Few people doubted his legitimacy. Legitimacy in this issue isn't characterized by the mainstream vote, vote tallies, our outrage or individuals quibbling about how the procedure turned out badly. It's characterized by a legitimate procedure that — regardless of the possibility that we contend about regardless of whether the Supreme Court settled on the morally remedy choice—was lawful and inside their domain. He promised of office, the Congress and Executive branch perceived that and hence he was the true blue POTUS. Suppositions on this issue are as unessential as sentiments on the presence of gravity.
I would say the answer is C because countries need to protect their own food from intruders
Trenches were dug in a zigzag pattern so that if an enemy entered the trench, he could not fire straight down the line. ... The main trench lines were connected by communicating trenches, allowing for the movement of messages, supplies, and soldiers and were lined with barbed wire.
Representatives maintain a positive relationship with constituents by:
I) staying in constant communication with the constituents i.e. use of letters, blogs, media appearances and websites
ii) Having their staff to carry out casework, or the staff helping to resolve problems which the constituents have encountered with the national government, and request for favours such as tours of government offices and setting up meetings.
iii) Voting for motions that would keep their constituents happy by serving the interests and concerns of the constituents.
