In 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was passed in response to the Enron and WorldCom scandals, offering broad protections for whistleblowers at public companies in order to encourage fraud reporting. Private companies were considered immune to the law.
But in 2014 the Supreme Court heard a challenge to SOX, and ruled that even though the plaintiffs were not employees of the publicly traded company, the SOX whistleblower statute applied to them. The reason? They suffered retaliation for reporting alleged fraud involving financial reporting of a publicly-traded company.
Here’s what the law now says:
SOX covers employees of a public company’s private contractors and subcontractors.
SOX covers privately-owned companies if they provide services for publicly-traded ones. Answer:
Explanation:
So they don’t impeach trump because if they were senate they would get him out if it wasn’t illegal.... no honestly that’s an opinion
Answer: you should not see your go near the place it happened
Explanation:
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>C. I dislike driving on a road that has a lot of curves.
</em>
<em />
<u>Explanation:</u>
A relative clause is one sort of ward condition with a subject and action word, yet cannot remain solitary as a sentence. It is now and then called an adjective clause since it capacities like a modifier it gives more data about a thing. A relative statement consistently starts with a "relative pronoun," which substitutes for an idea, a thing, expression, or a pronoun when sentences are joined.
Restrictive relative conditions give information that characterizes the thing—data that is essential for the complete ID of the situation. Use "that" or "which" for non-human things; use "that" or "who" for human traits.
