Answer:
Leapfrogging. Leapfrogging was a military strategy employed by the Allies in the Pacific War against the Axis powers (most notably Japan) during World War II. It entailed bypassing and isolating heavily fortified Japanese positions while preparing to take over strategically important islands.
Explanation:
PLS PLS PLS MARK AS BRAINLYST!!
I’ll give you two:
Yes: The “War” on the Indians was not a traditional war of declaration but of skirmishes. When wagon trains of people headed West Indians would commonly target them for raids and pillage, so along many routes forts where built and patrols would try and make sure they were safe. If the problem became worse the local garrison would find the tribe and come with a list of demands. Most of the time they were fired upon arrival out of fear or anger. This would lead to a small battle or skirmish which would likely cause collateral damage.
No: The wars raged in the west against the Indians were that of near genocide, and to call it anything but is misleading. To claim that the slaughter of hundreds of innocent people was a “battle” is absurd and shouldn’t be considered. Though in films that depict such events are dramatized and inaccurate, situations much like those were taking place around the west yearly.
C)Congressional state delegates were to be chose annually is true of the governmental structure set forth in the Articles of Confederation. This is exactly why they were seen as weak documents by the Federalists, because there was no bicameralism, no centralized government and no set of government branches, the Articles of Confederation (as they saw it) were merely set up to explain how to handle diplomatic relations.
Answer:
b) germany's secret request that mexico join the war against the united states
Explanation:
