All categories

3 years ago

Shifting from producing 500 scarves and 225 sweaters, to producing 100 scarves and 350 sweaters would

Business

2 answers:

m_a_m_a [10]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:A) result in an inefficient use of resources

Explanation:

Margarita [4]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

A) result in an inefficient use of resources

Explanation:

Formerly, the company was producing 500 scarves and 225 sweaters with the available resources. However, they shifted to producing 100 scarves and 350 sweaters with no mention of change in raw materials.This means that the production capacity when down even with the availability of initial raw material.

You might be interested in

Which of these statements is true?

AnnZ [28]

The correct statement is Inflation is problematic if unexpected

Money loses purchasing power during inflation and there's too much of it.

8 0

3 years ago

An NOL has the potential to lower income and reduce taxes for the taxpayer

iren2701 [21]

Answer:

The correct response is "for the carryover or carryforward year".

Explanation:

NOL usually happens that whenever a taxpayer's corporate taxable income exceeds his corporation yearly revenue. The whole NOL could be utilized to back split from several other taxable incomes, which have become perhaps throughout the future, in other words, managed to carry forward.
Throughout the current environment, and there'll be revenue, NOL would be adapted and the tax burden would be whittled down either by NOL proportion.

3 0

2 years ago

Dana writes a check to Becky on Dana’s account at Community Bank. The bank dishonors the check even though Dana has sufficient f

iren [92.7K]

Answer:

Dana

Explanation:

According to my research on different bank responsibilities, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the bank is completely liable to Dana. This is because the bank has a responsibility to Dana since she is the one who signed to open the account, which in term is her. They must now let her know why they dishonored the check and provide a solution.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.

3 0

3 years ago

You plan to invest in bonds that pay 6.0%, compounded annually. If you invest $10,000 today, how many years will it take for you

kati45 [8]

Answer:

The answer is 16 years.

Explanation:

The formula for calculating the value of an investment that is compounded annually is given by:

$V(n)=(1+R)^nP$

Where:

$n$ is the number of years the investment is compounded,

$R$ is the annual interest rate,

$P$ is the principal investment.

We know the following:

$25000=(1+0.06)^n \times 10000$

And we want to clear the value n from the equation.

The problem can be resolved as follows.

First step: divide each member of the equation by $10,000$ :

$\frac{ 25000}{10000}=(1+0.06)^n \times \frac{ 10000}{10000}$

$2.5=(1.06)^n$

Second step: apply logarithms to both members of the equation:

$log(2.5)=log (1.06)^n$

Third step: apply the logarithmic property $logA^n=n.logA$ in the second member of the equation:

$log(2.5)=n.log (1.06)$

Fourth step: divide both members of the equation by $log1.06$

$\frac{log(2.50)}{log (1.06)} =n$

$n= 15.7252$

We can round up the number and conclude that it will take 16 years for $10,000 invested today in bonds that pay 6% interest compounded annually, to grow to $25,000.

6 0

3 years ago

Jenny likes chocolates. One day, a friend offers her a chocolate bar and she is extremely happy on receiving it. As the day pr

liq [111]

Answer: Law of diminishing marginal utility

Explanation: In simple words, law of diminishing marginal utility states that as a consumer consume more of a good or service then the marginal benefit he or she receives from the additional consumption keeps on decreasing.

In the given case, Jenny's excitement keeps on decreasing with every chocolate she receives after a certain point of time.

Hence we can conclude that the given case illustrates law of diminishing marginal utility.

6 0

3 years ago