1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nasty-shy [4]
2 years ago
11

Answer is needed ASAP or within 30 Minutes. 30 Points. ANSWERS ONLY FROM HIGH SCHOLARS AND UP NOT TAKING ANSWERS FROM BELOW HIGH

SCHOOL/COLLEGE OR YOU WILL GET REPORTED. DON'T DO IT FOR THE POINTS OR YOU'LL GET REPORTED
The North American Free Trade Agreement is a treaty signed by the governments of the United States, Mexico, and Canada to improve trade between the three largest economies of North America. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is a clear example of how the United States and other nations have become increasingly interdependent. The agreement between the United States, Canada and Mexico established free trade in North America, and abolished tariffs (taxes on imports) among the three nations. Goods and services could flow freely throughout North America, which in effect has become one big market. This enables the growth of multinational corporations.


4. Growth of multinational corporations (corporations that have production in more than one country) has grown due to free trade agreements among nations. One such example is the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). What are the economic effects of NAFTA?
History
2 answers:
Arada [10]2 years ago
4 0
Twenty years after its implementation, the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA, has helped boost intraregional trade between Canada, Mexico, and the United States, but has fallen short of generating the jobs and the deeper regional economic integration its advocates promised decades ago.
Travka [436]2 years ago
3 0
Although NAFTA allows the economies of Canada, Mexico, and the US to become intertwined with one another, it takes away the need for competition, which runs markets. NAFTA elimnates all tariffs, which is good in the perspective of the buyer, but this eliminates compensation of the domestic creators of the goods. The purpose of a tariff is to raise the price of imported goods so that the sells of the same domestically made product can increase. Without tariffs, the cheaper, imported goods will be sold. This, eventually, will lead to an increase in total imports and a decrease in total exports which would cause the aggregate demand line to shift to the left, indicating a decrease in GDP over time for the country that is importing a plethora of goods. The country that is supplying these goods would see a right shift in aggregate demand, meaning an increase in GDP, due to an increase in net exports.

Hope this helps, I'm a senior in high school and just finished my economics course with an A. :)
<span />
You might be interested in
The people of the indus river valley
devlian [24]
What do you need to know about the Indus River Valley people?
3 0
3 years ago
HELP!!
KonstantinChe [14]

Answer:

They occupied higher ground

Explanation:

Again, I haven't taken the class, but I love american history, so here you go XD

5 0
2 years ago
What rights did many freed people take advantage of after the Civil War?
Delicious77 [7]
Voting rights, I would say. 
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In a paragraph, describe what you think Roosevelt meant when he described the United States as the “arsenal of democracy.”
julia-pushkina [17]

Answer:

Down below

Explanation:

Arsenal of Democracy was a phrase used by President Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882–1945) to describe the United States as he tried to arouse popular support for sending military aid to nations fighting against the Axis powers (Germany, Italy, and Japan, among others) during World War II (1939–1942).

5 0
2 years ago
Question 45 pts
olasank [31]

Answer:

reparations from Germany

Explanation:

The treaty meetings at Versailles had many nations in attendance and they pinned the blame of the World War I happening which later resulted in loss of lives and properties on Germany. It was agreed that Germany would pay for all the damages other nations suffered as a result of the war. Wilson however was against it and preferred countries being treated equally and fixing the damages themselves.

This later made Germany to have a weak economy due to the reparations demanded.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What makes bruno most unhappy about the idea of leaving berlin ansers.com?
    9·1 answer
  • A historian may use his imagination combined with his knowledge to speculate what the complete history might be.
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following are examples of Ronald Reagan's domestic philosophy and policies? A. Congress enacted the largest single
    8·2 answers
  • How did geography contribute to the start of the Renaissance in Italy
    7·1 answer
  • How long did the Charleston Nine last, and what was the building that burned?
    10·1 answer
  • The great migration is best described as
    15·2 answers
  • The arms act in India 1878
    14·1 answer
  • What were the economic effects of Hurricane Katrina? Check all that apply. Unemployment doubled statewide. Demand for common goo
    13·1 answer
  • HELP I HAVE 20 MINUTES What was the first advance in refrigeration technologies in the 1800s?
    12·2 answers
  • The Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S Constitución affected the lives of millions of African Americans by -
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!