Answer:
- Passage 1 ⇒ Flashback
- Passage 2 ⇒ Flashback
- Passage 3 ⇒ Flashforward
Explanation:
Passages 1 and 2 are being spoken of as events that have already occurred and are being recounted. This makes them flashbacks which, as the term implies, refers to a narrative style where the narrator speaks of events in the past.
Passage 3 on the other hand is the opposite. It alludes to events that are yet to come which means that it is using a flashforward narrative style where one talks of events they believe will occur or that they want to occur.
Answer:
The characters include the wicked old man, the nice old man, the nice old man's wife, and maybe the dog. The story takes place in a castle and on a farm, I think it takes place back when there were still castles with kings and queens. The stories point of view is third person omniscient because it uses words like he, she, and we don't know any of the character's thoughts.
(Sorry I could not give you an answer quicker and this might sound bad because I'm only in middle school)
Explanation:
Answer:
That she doesnt want followers she wants friends.
Explanation:
Answer: Dr. Naismith would have been surprised, if he had known how popular basketball would become.
Explanation:
The best way to combine these two sentences is to put a comma between them.
When joined together, these two sentences form a third conditional sentence.
In a third conditional sentence, one part of the sentence contains 'would have' + past participle <em>(would have been surprised)</em>, while the other part of the sentence contains 'if' and past perfect form of the verb (<em>if he had known</em>). Third conditional sentences are used to talk about impossible outcomes. Dr. Naismith was a physical educator who died in 1939. Therefore, the scenario of him witnessing the popularity of basketball is not possible.
Sure! I will be glad to help :)