Answer: This argument has Some merits but it also has some logical errors that undermines its reasoning and conclusion.
Explanation:
(1) IT FAILED TO GIVE THE TOTAL POPULATION OF WORKERS FROM WHERE THE SAMPLE(1200 PEOPLE) WERE DERIVED AND WHAT SAMPLING METHOD WAS USED: This is a logical error, sampling has to be in RELATION TO THE POPULATION.The sampling method should have been defined.Samples may have been taken from a given A CLASS OF WORKERS.
(2) IT SHOULD HAVE GIVEN CLEARER AND OTHER CHOICES RELATED TO MANAGEMENT ISSUES: It should have made more choices of questions about management issues so that a BROAD, ELABORATE, REASONABLE,ACCURATE AND CONVINCING conclusion will be arrived at.
Answer:
C. 3
Explanation:
Sentence three should be the last sentence of the paragraph because it contains the transitional word <em>finally </em>- meaning <em>in conclusion </em>or <em>lastly- </em> and which introduces the last idea or closure of a paragraph. Besides, sentence four refers to compact cars, which are mentioned in sentence two.
We will wash the wheels with water whenever we can.
Alliteration in the repetition of a sound or letter. In this case, I repeated the 'w' in the sentence.
Hope this helps! :)
Yes we could predict that they would be reunited later in the story because no one can live without their parents
"like a sunbeam" - it is used to give deeper meaning and description to what her face looks like in person so the reader can feel as if they are standing in front of her seeing that face.
