<em>Would a prediction be accurate if the person about to act becomes aware of the prediction prior to the act itself? </em>
This is a classic problem of the deterministic approach to action. If psychology was perfect, it is likely that this would enable psychologists to predict how a person is going to act in any situation. It would also make psychologists able to predict when this act would take place. However, for such a prediction to be useful, the psychologist would have to keep this information from the subject. Otherwise, the knowledge of the prediction could potentially make the person act in a different way, rendering the prediction obsolete.
<em>Does the fact that a prediction can be known in advance disprove the possibility of predicting accurately or is that fact just one more antecedent condition? </em>
The fact that a prediction can be known in advance does disprove the possibility of predicting accurately. The moment a prediction is made, the prediction alters the state of the components that were necessary to know in order to make a prediction. Therefore, the prediction becomes obsolete as the action might or might not happen in the way that was previously predicted.
Answer:
Computer has become very important nowadays because it is very much accurate, fast and can accomplish many tasks easily. Otherwise to complete those tasks manually much more time is required. It can do very big calculations in just a fraction of a second. Moreover it can store huge amount of data in it.
Explanation:
omputers can be used to give learners audio-visual packages, interactive exercises, and remote learning, including tutoring over the internet. They can be used to access educational information from intranet and internet sources, or via e-books.Jan
Hope it helps
Hi there!
The answer to this question is True.
Your friend, ASIAX
<span>He believed that they had a moral responsibility to use that wealth to lift up the conditions of everyone else in society. He felt that it was the duty of those of great means to be philanthropic to the point at which they did not have anything of their own at the end of their lifetimes.</span>
Answer:
1. Outer Story- B.the interpretation and response of the actors within the story
2. Inner story- A.brings ideas and principle down to earth for clarity
3. Concrete Language- D.objective events and circumstances in the situation
4. Figurative Language- E.portrays one thing in terms of another
5. Descriptive Language- C.adds color and precision to the picture by using modifiers
Explanation:
- The outer story in a writing refers to the external factors in a story that is visible to the audience such as the actors in the play, the place where the story occurred, at what time the event happened, and what actually happened. It sets the story in motion and gives it a sense of direction.
- The Inner story is the deeper meaning of the story. It is the lesson the reader takes away from the entire story and the effect of the events on the reader.
- Concrete Language provides a sound and objective understanding of the story, also supplying specific details that shape the reader's understanding of the story.
- Figurative Language is a type of language that uses words in such a way that is unconventional to provide a deeper meaning to the story being told.
- Descriptive Language refers to language that paints a clearer picture of an event, by appealing to the senses of touch, sight, smell, hearing, and taste.
