The element of a personal narrative that would be best for Nick to include next is:
A. a precise description of what the writer is witnessing when he says that he "could scarcely believe what [his] eyes were seeing."
- This question is missing the paragraph that provides the context to be answered. I have found it online and attached it.
- As we can see in the attached file, Nick's narrative, so far, has ended in <u>suspense</u>. Readers know there is something going on, but they do not know what it is.
- Nick was lost in reflection when the animals began to make a lot of noise. <u>He can't even believe what he is seeing!</u> So what comes next?
- Nick should now tell readers what he is seeing, giving a precise description that will quench readers' curiosity. This means letter A is the correct option.
- <u>Letter B would be pointless</u>, since adding a line saying the <u>same thing</u> the narrator has just said would provide nothing new.
- <u>Letter C </u>would be important, but not at this moment. It is more like a <u>conclusion</u> or <u>resolution</u>, after everything is done.
- <u>Letter D is also pointless</u>. We already know the point of view is in first person. The whole paragraph is narrated using first-person pronouns.
Learn more about this topic here:
brainly.com/question/75925?referrer=searchResults
<span>In July 2012, a few months before he was to officially take over as president of the College Board, David Coleman invited Les Perelman, then a director of writing at M.I.T., to come meet with him in Lower Manhattan. Of the many things the College Board does — take part in research, develop education policy, create curriculums — it is perhaps most recognized as the organization that administers the SAT, and Perelman was one of the exam’s harshest and most relentless critics. Since 2005, when the College Board added an essay to the SAT (raising the total possible score from 1,600 to 2,400), Perelman had been conducting research that highlighted what he believed were the inherent absurdities in how the essay questions were formulated and scored. His earliest findings showed that length, more than any other factor, correlated with a high score on the essay. More recently, Perelman coached 16 students who were retaking the test after having received mediocre scores on the essay section. He told them that details mattered but factual accuracy didn’t. “You can tell them the War of 1812 began in 1945,” he said. He encouraged them to sprinkle in little-used but fancy words like “plethora” or “myriad” and to use two or three preselected quotes from prominent figures like Franklin Delano Roosevelt, regardless of whether they were relevant to the question asked. Fifteen of his pupils scored higher than the 90th percentile on the essay when they retook the exam, he said.</span>
Answer:
As regards the poem, America is described as a merging of a variety of voices, American voices. He describes it as what people sing while working. People is portrayed as very different from each other but with the same vision of the country. America is seen as plural, many occupations and skills but it has equal opportunities for them
Answer:
What example, there is no example