They both were action to expand borders and us influence
In Europe the average saving rate is 10.6% and in America it is 3.5%. This means that every fiscal year Americans save only 3.5% of their yearly income and Europeans save 10.6%.
This is dangerous for Americans since in the event of an unexpected crisis they will not have the liquidities to pay for it. One of the reasons is that in the USA Americans use credit cards massively and are thus usually indebted to Credit Card companies and most of their income goes into paying them both the interest and the principal. Marketing is also far more aggressive in America and manipulates people into buying stuff they do not really need.
As the federal capital, the District of Columbia is a special federal district, not a state, and therefore does not have voting representation in Congress. The Constitution grants Congress exclusive jurisdiction over the District in "all cases whatsoever". ... D.C. residents have no representation in the Senate.
Answer:
Decisions based on the law? i think
Explanation:
or maybe it was Accountability to the law?
I'm positively sure its one of the two
-hope this helps :)
The United States v. Fields case ended up on a federal death sentence imposed on Fields for commitig a federal capital offense.
This sentence was made largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could predict Fields would be a risk to society in the future.
The problem here is that the psychiatrist issued this crucial testimony without doing any testing or offering any objective empirical data whatsoever.
To this day, there's still much debate involving how a Court can determine risk to society or future violence from an individual, in a safe and reliable manner that reaches necessary standards for a case of such magnitude assessing death penalty.
Hope this helps!
