In an effort to prevent any alliances between the Cherokee Indians and the Mexicans, the Federal Government sent Sam Houston and John Forbes to the territories occupied by the Native Americans in order to negotiate the boundaries in which they could peacefully settle. These negotiations ended with a treaty on February 23, 1836. However, this document was rejected by the Senate because it considered the consultation had exceeded its powers by offering land grants to the Cherokees. Houston decided to disregard this and maintained the kept the treaty made with the Indians. However, President Mirabeau B. Lamar would ultimately agree with the Senate's interpretations and leave the treaty without effect.
<span>At one time there was a tax on Hindu citizens as well as a tax on other non-Muslim citizens. Akbar made the decision to defend religious freedom during his reign and backed it up by getting rid of both of these taxes. Akbar was the Mughal emperor from 1556-1605.</span>
The correct answer is Bangladesh, formerly known as East Pakistan.
After the Partition of India, two countries were created: India and Pakistan. The later was composed of the areas with a Muslim majority, but geographically it had two parts, which lied far away from each other and had no land connection: West and East Pakistan. the Indo-Pakistan war concerned the split of the two parts into independent countries.
Mcdonald’s
easy points here
Answer:
While the U.S. Constitution applies to the federal government with the states being subordinate, the Texas Constitution (and all state constitutions) sets in writing what the state government can and cannot do with the counties being subordinate.
While similar to the U.S Constitution, the Texas Constitution has some striking differences, many of which can make it more difficult to file constitutionally based lawsuits under Texas law. One of the most striking differences between the Texas and U.S. Constitutions is length. The U.S. Constitution is intentionally brief and vague, which allows the federal government to broadly interpret it. The Texas Constitution was written leaving little room for interpretation to ensure it cannot be interpreted in a manner inconsistent with the constitution’s ideals.
The Texas Constitution gets its length from going into great detail. While the Texas Constitution grants Texans similar rights to the U.S. Constitution, the Texas Constitution is much more specific regarding exactly when these rights are infringed upon. While it may seem like this specificity would make legal matters cut and dry, in practice it can greatly complicate things.
Explanation:
Make sure to re-word it or use spinbot.com so you don't get caught plagiarizing
