The nationalist inclinations of the Marshall Court were apparent in a series of decisions on the legal status of "Indian tribes" within the United States.
<h3>What is the Marshall trilogy?</h3>
Three Supreme Court rulings from the early nineteenth century, together known as the Marshall Trilogy, upheld the political and legal status of Indian tribes. The key features are-
- According to Johnson v. M'Intosh (1823), private individuals were not permitted to buy land from Native Americans.
- According to Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831), the Cherokee people were reliant on the United States and had a guardian-like relationship with them.
- The connection between tribes, state, and federal governments was outlined in Worcester v. Georgia (1832), which declared that the federal government was the only entity with the ability to deal with Indian nations.
The nationalist inclinations of the Marshall Court are shown by-
- The Marshall Court helped define the reach of the federal judiciary during the early years of the American Republic, a period known as Judicial Nationalism.
- Marshall's views on nationalism, the broad interpretation of the Constitution, property rights, and the primacy of the federal government over the idea of "states' rights" bolstered the role of the federal government and, in particular, the appellate function of the high court.
Learn more about the Marshall court, here brainly.com/question/5347746
#SPJ4
Yes he or she can by first doing a research
Answer:
City manager.
Explanation:
Administates a city and the operations it condones.
Answer:
140,000
Slaves = more than 100,000
Explanation:
Answer: B. To promote happiness and peace during the Christmas season
Explanation: Hope you have a great day
