The correct answer is C. The use of camels as transportation
Explanation:
In writing, one of the most important factors that determine the topic you select is the number of pages you are allowed to write that is linked to how narrow or broad a topic is. In general terms, it is considered a topic is broad when the author will need to add multiple details, information, and pieces of evidence to develop the topic in a complete way, which usually requires at least 5 or 10 pages but can even require more pages and deals with general topic or events. On the other hand, a topic is considered narrow, when it addresses a specific point of a general topic and requires less than 5 pages to be developed.
Considering this, the topic that would be appropriate for a three-page research paper is "the use of camels as transportation in ww1" because this topic does not address a general events such as the world war one or the impact or effects of some event that would require multiple details, but address a specific point which makes it a narrow topic that can be developed using few details and therefore is appropriate for a three-page research paper.
Try and remember it this way. Cause and effect. Effect is the result of something, while affect is like it influenced something.
Answer:
b.Woven symbols in a quipu match a list of words.
Explanation:I got this right on a unit test
Julius Caesar is a play deeply concerned with the idea of rhetoric, or persuasion. The play is driven by persuasion. Cassius convinces Brutus that Caesar must die, setting the story in motion. The resolution of the plot is decided by Antony's speech to the plebeians. Shakespeare sees rhetoric as one of the most powerful forces in the world; able to topple kings and crown them. The play, Julius Caesar, examines what gives rhetoric its power by pitting Brutus's speech against Mark Antony's. Shakespeare shows Antony's rhetoric to be superior by the effect he has on the plebeians.
Brutus's speech fails to convince permanently win over the crowd because he does not understand them. His first failure is at the beginning of his speech when he asks the plebeians to, "Censure me in you wisdom, and awake your senses". It seems as though he does not realize that he is speaking to an angry mob. His argument is based on cold and calculating reason. He argues that the love of freedom is stronger than the ties of friendship. "Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more". This logic cannot sink deeply into an emotional mob. He asks the plebeians to "Believe me for mine honor, and have respect to mine honor that you may believe". He cannot use his honor as a reason for belief in his story when his honor is in question. Brutus fails to offer any proof of Caesar's ambition, the central point of his argument. He ends his speech with a verbal attack on any who disagree with him, essentially calling them cowards. This silences dissension temporarily but when the other side is presented it does not help his cause. Brutus's argument fails because he much less a man of the people than he would like to think.
Mark Antony's argument is a great piece of rhetoric. He successfully accomplishes his object of convincing the plebeians that Brutus is a traitor. He has mastered the use of emotion, subtlety and logic. He uses emotional phrases such as, "My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar" and "Oh judgment, thou art fled to brutish beasts". Which give him a connection with the emotion the crowd is feeling at the death of Caesar. He begins not by attacking Brutus..
It’s either identity or sadness bc “a women like that is misunderstood” meaning she is probably been rumored about or been judged a lot. “I have been her kind” that’s pretty much the author sharing her pain and it obviously sounds pretty depressing.
