From what I think is because laws weren't placed to protect people/workers, since owners pays close attention to money instead of the health of their workers.
<span>The correct answer is B) They provided funds for security</span>
The funds provided by the U.S. Government funds were used for security. The government did not <span>pay for the actual Games nor the new Venues themselves.</span><span> To pay for the games, Atlanta relied on commercial sponsorship and ticket sales.</span>
economic idk specifically what u mean by effective but in effective in damage there was a lot to be rebuilt after the war and the cost of bullets and guns was bad to
Hey there,
The answer is Place
Hope this helps :))
~Top♥
I say Israel - and I hope this is taken in an utterly nonpartisan way, which takes absolutely no position vis-a-vis the legitimacy of either conservatism or the Israeli state. I just think some core aspects of Israeli government and society are in line with mainstream US conservatism: a free-market liberal democracy of course, but with formal religious-ethnic affiliation, compulsory military service with training on firearms (and licensing to possess same) for all citizens, and a generally hawkish stance on questions of military and defense. They are also highly security-oriented, some would say in a much more effective way than the US government, and its security apparatus employs profiling techniques which almost undoubtedly have a racial component (<span>and </span><span>conservatives would no doubt want to insist that these two facts are directly related). I believe that taxation rates are roughly on par with that in the US, if not a bit less... though not nearly as low as Switzerland. </span>
