Answer:
Explanation:
The question is really the wrong question. What Wilson is answering is the right of neutrals to defend themselves. The fact of the matter is that armed neutrality has not worked. The reason it has not worked, Wilson asserts, is because force must accompany any political stance. You can be armed to the teeth, but if you do not use the arms, an enemy will scoff at you.
Wilson's solution is to use the arms. The first sentence you need is begins with "It is common prudence ... " He means that America must use its arms because to do less isn't prudent.
The second sentence is much harder to find. I think I'd use the next sentence as well. That is because I believe the speech is really about the flaws of armed neutrality. But I think the answer you want is the sentence beginning with "The German Government has ... " even though it does not address the question directly.
Question II
Elizabeth is telling her subjects what she is prepared to do. She is telling them directly what her duties are and what a monarch by the command of God, must do to fulfill the duties she has been assigned.
She is, by implication, telling her soldiers that those are her duties and she is prepared to do whatever it takes to fulfill them. She is saying indirectly that they have similar duties, and they must fulfill them. I think both of these quotations miss what is being said. For me the answer is "Let tyrants fear ... "
This is a very long sentence. Read it to its end and you will see that she is appealing to them to do as she would do, not what she says she will do. Nor will she hide behind her skirts for she has the heart of a warrior/king, and a king of England no less.
