I believe the answer is D. Bank
Answer:
at low levels of output, AFC will be high, while at high levels of output, MC will be high as the result of diminishing returns.
Explanation:
In Economics, the law of diminishing marginal utility states that as the unit of a good or service consumed by an individual increases, the additional satisfaction he or she derives from consuming additional units would start decreasing or diminishing as the units of good or service consumed increases.
The short-run average total cost (ATC) curve of a firm will tend to be U-shaped because at low levels of output, average fixed cost (AFC) will be high, while at high levels of output, marginal cost (MC) will be high as the result of diminishing returns.
This ultimately implies that, the average fixed cost (AFC) will be high at small (low-level) output rates while marginal cost (MC) will be high at large (high-level) output rates due to diminishing marginal returns.
As a result of the law of diminishing marginal returns, a business firm would experience some rising per unit costs in the short-run.
In conclusion, an increase in the level of output for a business firm will eventually lead to an increase in average total cost (ATC) and marginal cost (MC) due to the law of diminishing marginal returns.
Answer:
C. subsidizing: taxing
Explanation:
An activity generates a positive externality if the benefits of economic activities to third parties exceeds its costs.
Example of activities that generate positive externality are education and research.
Government ought to encourage the production of activities that generates postive externality. One of the ways this can be done is through Subsidy. Subsidy reduces cost of production and increases production.
An activity generates negative externality if the benefits of economic activities to third parties is less its costs.
An example of negative externality is pollution.
Government can discourage activities that generates negative externality by taxation. Taxation increases the cost of production and discourages production.
I hope my answer helps you
<u>Calculation of Return on Total Assets:</u>
Return on Total assets can be calculated using the following formula:
Return on Total Assets = Net Income / Total Assets
We can calculate Net income as follows:
Sales $2960
Less: Operating Costs $2675
Less: Interest charges $125
Income before tax = 160
Less: Tax (160*40%) = 64
Net Income = $96
Hence , Return on Total Assets = 96/2100 = 0.0457 =<u>4.57%</u>
Answer:
A. 3.21 years
Explanation:
In the payback, we analyze in how many years the invested amount is recovered. The computation is shown below:
In year 0 = $7,500
In year 1 = $1,100
In year 2 = $1,640
In year 3 = $3,800
In year 4 = $4,500
If we sum the first 3 year cash inflows than it would be $6,540
Now we deduct the $6,540 from the $7,500 , so the amount would be $960 as if we added the fourth year cash inflow so the total amount exceed to the initial investment. So, we deduct it
And, the next year cash inflow is $4,500
So, the payback period equal to
= 3 years + $960 ÷ $4,500
= 3.21 years
In 3.21 yeas, the invested amount is recovered.
